Adel Hamad back in the News

Today the Supreme Court hears arguments concerning the rights of detainees at Guantanamo. Because of this there has been a reemergence of interest in the media regarding Adel Hamad.

Project Hamad appeared on Oregon Public Broadcasting’s Morning Edition with host April Baer. You can listen to the the program here: Portlanders Keep an Eye on Detainees’ Cases.

British journalist Andy Worthington wrote a piece entitled Guantanamo Whistleblower Launces New Attack on Rigged Tribunals, that appeared on Counterpunch and the Huffington Post. In this article he discusses the importance of the sworn testimony of Lieutenant Colonel Stephen Abraham in the upcoming Supreme Court cases. Adel Hamad’s lawyers obtained this sworn testimony on behalf of Adel Hamad’s case but because of how damning it is to the legitimacy of the Guantanamo tribunal system it should play prominently in the arguments on behalf of the detainees this week.

Lastly, we have put several of the important documents on the Project Hamad website. You can find them here.

They include the following as pdf documents:

1)Lt. Col. Stephen Abraham’s declaration about the serious flaws in the CSRT process. The declaration of an officer intimately involved in the Combatant Status Review Tribunal process, showing among other things that pressure was exerted to find all detainees as enemy combatants, and that evidence in favor of a detainee’s innocence was never reviewed. This declaration will play a role in the upcoming review of detainee rights by the Supreme Court.

2)Declaration of William Teesdale concerning the negotiations between Sudan and the State Department for Adel Hamad’s release. Many detainees cleared for release remain in Guantanamo. For years, the U.S. has blamed the detainee’s home country for this, claiming that the home country was unwilling to cooperate with the United States in repatriating their citizens. This document not only exposes the lie to this argument, but actually reveals the U.S. government’s continued efforts to delay and frustrate attempts by the Sudanese government to gain the release of their citizens.

3) Notice of Adel Hamad’s New Tribunal. A year has passed since new evidence was submitted in district court on Adel Hamad’s behalf. Only now, now that the court has agreed to hear oral arguments in Hamad v Bush, has the U.S. government suddenly agreed to a new tribunal for Hamad. It is probably both an attempt to avoid having a legal opinion go against them and an attempt to regain control of the process again. If Hamad ever gets this new Tribunal, and it is performed with some semblance of justice, it would be an opportunity to show that no evidence has been presented to lawfully hold him as an enemy combatant.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.